Back to Op-Eds

Op-Ed

Seeing Is an Act of Faith

Eric Peterson · August 16, 2026

Seeing Is an Act of Faith 8-2-26 (644)

We often say that seeing is believing, but the reverse might be closer to the truth. Seeing depends on our faith that the light reaching our eyes corresponds to something real and that our brains present a trustworthy, if imperfect, version of the world.

Vision begins when light strikes the retina, where it is converted into electrical signals that travel through the optic nerve to the brain. There, they are assembled into what we experience as sight. It is a remarkable achievement—but it is not a photograph.

We carry proof of this inside our own eyes. Each eye has a blind spot—a small region with no photoreceptors at all. We rarely notice it because the brain quietly fills in what should be there, borrowing from the surrounding scene to complete the picture.

The brain can also generate images on its own. Dreams and hallucinations show how internally produced visions can be vivid and convincing. Yet despite these limitations, our vision is remarkably reliable.

But the same process that allows us to make sense of the world also leaves us vulnerable to manipulation.

Whenever we identify strongly with a person, party, or cause, conflicting evidence is often minimized. The more we defend a belief, the harder it becomes to let it go. Changing our minds can feel more like betraying ourselves and our community than just accepting new evidence.

Throughout history, authoritarian regimes, corporate interests, and ideological movements have exploited this to override physical observation. It begins with trivial things—disputing crowd sizes or making allegations of vandalism refuted by investigators. But telling the public to deny what it sees is a calculated exercise in power. By establishing dominance over basic perception in trivial situations, authoritarian systems lay the psychological groundwork for compliance on serious issues like war, climate policy, public health, and corruption.

A striking example followed the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. Millions watched the assault unfold on live television as participants attempted to stop the peaceful transfer of power. More than 1,500 people were subsequently charged—with hundreds convicted by juries or pleading guilty—for crimes ranging from trespassing to assaulting police and seditious conspiracy.

Initially, vast majorities of Americans strongly opposed even the thought of pardoning those convicted of violent crimes. Yet years of relentless political messaging recasting the attack as a peaceful gathering have shattered that consensus. This stands as a textbook example of how repetition and authority can persuade millions to deny not just what is reported, but what they watched with their own eyes.

Our individual perceptions, valuable as they are, are only the beginning. Reality is rarely established by one person; it emerges as people compare their experiences with each other and with evidence.

This process is at the heart of science, journalism, the legal system, and democracy. These institutions are designed to handle fierce disagreement, but they cannot survive a systematic detachment from reality. Families and friendships also depend on the principle that our words correspond, however imperfectly, to events that actually occurred. Without that foundation, disagreements cannot be resolved, institutions lose legitimacy, and cooperation gives way to suspicion.

Emerging technologies like artificial intelligence have made deception easier, faster and more convincing. But hyper-realistic fakes only work because our minds are already primed to accept comfortable fabrications over uncomfortable truths. Paradoxically, AI—like the camera before it—may also become one of our most valuable tools for exposing manipulation by cross-referencing sources and detecting inconsistencies.

Seeing begins with an act of faith, but living together depends on choosing evidence and honesty over ideology. Healthy relationships and free societies require people willing to tell the truth about the world they actually see.

One of the defining questions facing Americans today is whether we still possess the courage to trust our own eyes, test our conclusions, and together, place our faith in reality.

Was this helpful?

Comments

Share a thoughtful response. Comments are reviewed before they appear publicly.

No comments yet. Be the first to add one.

Log in or create an account to leave a comment. Email verification is required.

Report this article

Flag content that may raise a legal concern or violate our terms of service.

Log in or register (with a verified email) to report this article.

Related articles

Jun 13, 2026 · Site Administrator

When a county loses its emergency room, it loses more than beds. It loses obstetrics, trauma response, and the confidence of young families deciding whether to stay. Policy debates treat rural healthcare as a budget line...

Read article

Jun 12, 2026 · Site Administrator

Parents missing shifts because a sitter canceled is not a personal failure—it is a systems failure. Childcare deserts map cleanly onto workforce shortages and educational gaps.Other countries treat early care as public i...

Read article